Fortsetzung Blog Helioda1 auf CHZA1 Blog:
http://chza1.blogspot.de/

Neuer Blog DgM: DgM_001v101 (HELIODA1)
http://dgm1-101.blogspot.de/2017/01/dgm001v101.html

Der Torbogen des Baal und der Gipfel der Weltregierung

Der Torbogen des Baal und der Gipfel der Weltregierung: Wussten Sie, dass 4000 führende Persönlichkeiten aus der ganzen Welt aus 130

Quelle: Der Torbogen des Baal und der Gipfel der Weltregierung

Der Torbogen des Baal und der Gipfel der Weltregierung

PROLETHEUS

– POSTED ON 18. FEBRUAR 2017POSTED IN: GLOBALISIERUNG, INTERNATIONALE ORG. KRIMINALITÄT, NEUE WELTORDNUNG, WICHTIGES

Diese Woche wurde der Torbogen des Baal zum dritten Mal zu Ehren des Gipfels der Weltregierung aufgestellt

Wussten Sie, dass 4000 führende Persönlichkeiten aus der ganzen Welt aus 130 verschiedenen Staaten in dieser Woche in Dubai zusammenkamen, um den Weltregierungsgipfel abzuhalten? Die Zusammenkunft wurde vom 12. – 14. Februar veranstaltet. Über 100 international bekannte Redner hielten Ansprachen, darunter der UN-Generalsekretär Antonio Guterres, Christine Lagarde und Elon Musk. Das ganze kann man auf der offiziellen Webseite hier nachlesen.

Der erste Weltregierungsgipfel fand 2013 statt. Warum berichten die Lügenmedien nicht darüber? Hatte nicht schon der EU-Kasper aus Belgien Herman Van Rompuy 2009 den Beginn der “Global Governance” angekündigt?

Wie auch immer: Um dem Geist der Wahnsinnigen in der Weltregierung zu beflügeln, wurde ein Tor des Baal nach dem Triumphbogen von Palmyra rekonstruiert. Breaking Israel New berichtet:

Ein Replikat eines römischenTorbogens, der einst vor dem heidnischen Tempel des Baal stand, wurde für den in dieser Woche stattfindenden Weltregierungsgipfel in Dubai errichtet, um eine Szene darzustellen, die ein Rabbi als Symbol der gefährlichen Verbindung von Ishmael und Edom gegen Israel bezeichnet.
Der ursprüngliche römische Triumphbogen stand für 1800 Jahre in Palmyra in Syrien, bis er im Oktober 2015 vom ISIS zerstört wurde. Das 28 Meter hohe Replikat (Originalgröße) wurde vom Institut für digitale Archäologie als Gemeinschaftsprojekt der Universitäten von Oxford und Harvard erstellt und bereits zweimal zur Schau gestellt. ….

“For they have consulted together with one consent; against Thee do they make a covenant; The tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites; Moav, and the Hagrites.” Psalms 83:6-7 (The Israel Bible™)

image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/arch.png

A model of the arch from the Temple of Ba’al was erected in Dubai for the World Government Summit. (Screenshot)

A replica of a Roman arch that once stood in front of the pagan Temple of Ba’al was erected for the World Government Summit in Dubai this week, creating a scene that one rabbi claims symbolizes the dangerous fusion of Ishmael and Edom against Israel.

The original Roman Victory Arch stood for 1,800 years in Palmyra, Syria, until it was destroyed by ISIS in October 2015. A full-size 28-meter tall replica of the arch was created last year by the Institute for Digital Archeology, a joint project of Oxford and Harvard universities, and has been displayed twice before.

The replica was erected for the opening of the World Government Summit that opened on Sunday in Dubai. Based in the United Arab Emirates, the summit is an international organization for global dialogue where leaders in government, business, and technology discuss how governments operate and how policies are made.

The first summit, held in 2013, was attended by former US President Barack Obama, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, and other world leaders.

Though a Roman artifact recreated in a modern Arab metropolis may seem incongruous, Rabbi Pinchas Winston, a prolific author and End of Days scholar, saw a deeper meaning in it that is incredibly relevant today.

Though Rome and the Arab Emirates appear in different parts of the world and at different points in history, Rabbi Winston sees them as connected ideologically and spiritually.

“Tradition tells of four exiles, the last being the Roman exile. Israel is being assailed by the Arabs but nowhere do we hear of a fifth, Arab or Ishmael exile,” explained Rabbi Winston. “This Roman arch in Dubai symbolically ties them both together: Ishmael, the Arabs, and Edom, which was epitomized by Rome.”

The original arch in Palmyra, built by Roman Emperor Septimius Severus, stood in front of a preexisting temple that was used by the Mesopotamians to worship the pagan god Bel, mentioned often in the Bible as Ba’al.

For he built again the high places which Chizkiyahu his father had destroyed; and he reared up altars for Baal. II Kings 21:3

“Just like the Romans, the Arabs are trying to control the world, and succeeding,” said Rabbi Winston. “Even though it is the Arabs against the Jews, it is really the Arabs continuing the mission of Edom to conquer the world. This connection between Dubai and Rome is showing that Edom never ended. It just put on a different mask.”

The first century Jewish sage Jonathan ben Uzziel wrote about how this Biblical alliance between Ishmael and Esau and would reappear at the End of Days. Clear evidence of the spiritual connection between these two seemingly disparate worlds can be found in the growing political cooperation between Rome and the Muslim/Arab world.

The bond has manifested in the strengthening of ties between the Vatican and the Palestinian Authority, as well as Pope Francis’ meeting with the President of Iran.

Though Edom and the desire to rule the world is personified by Rome, Rabbi Winston explained that the archetype has Biblical roots.

“The push for one world government goes back to the Tower of Babel, trying to put the power in the hands of the wealthy, the powerful, and the arrogant,” he said.

And they said: ‘Come, let us build us a city, and a tower, with its top in heaven, and let us make us a name; lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.’ Genesis 11:4

“The Arab desire to rule the world is part of their religion and that is also very Roman,” continued Rabbi Winston. “World rule is also the religion of the rich and powerful.”

The motive behind world rule can sound altruistic, but Rabbi Winston noted a critical distinction.

“The desire to fix the world and to make it a better place resembles a Messianic movement,” the rabbi said. “But unless it is based in God, it is twisted and turns destructive because it is based on ego. It has always attracted secular academia because it aggrandizes Human Intellect over the One who rules over us all.”

The reproduction appeared for the first time in London on April 19 during the UNESCO Heritage Week, which coincided disturbingly with Beltane, a major pagan festival for worshiping Ba’al. The arch appeared again in New York City’s City Hall Park in September.

Read more at https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/83746/new-world-order-forming-pagan-temple-baal-arch/#mi5drTFl8yBIVTQ1.99

MOLOCH (MOLECH).

By: Isidore Singer, George A. Barton

Table of Contents

—Biblical Data:

In the Masoretic text the name is "Molech"; in the Septuagint "Moloch." The earliest mention of Molech is in Lev. xviii. 21, where the Israelite is forbidden to sacrifice any of his children to Molech. Similarly, in Lev. xx. 2-5, it is enacted that a man who sacrifices his seed to Molech shall surely be put to death. Then, curiously, it is provided that he shall be cut off from the congregation. In I Kings xi. 7 it is said that Solomon built a high place for Molech in the mountain "that is before Jerusalem." The same passage calls Molech an Ammonite deity. The Septuagint as quoted in the New Testament (Acts vii. 43) finds a reference to Moloch in Amos v. 26; but this is a doubtful passage. In II Kings xxiii. 10 it is stated that one of the practises to which Josiah put a stop by his reform was that of sacrificing children to Molech, and that the place where this form of worship had been practised was at Topheth, "in the valley of the children of Hinnom." This statement is confirmed by Jer. xxxii. 35. From II Kings xxi. 6 it may be inferred that this worship was introduced during the reign of Manasseh. The impression left by an uncritical reading of these passages is that Molech-worship, with its rite of child-sacrifice, was introduced from Ammon during the seventh century B.C.

Nature of the Worship.—Critical View:

The name "Molech," later corrupted into "Moloch," is an intentional mispointing of "Melek," after the analogy of "bosheth" (comp. Hoffmann in Stade's "Zeitschrift," iii. 124). As to the rites which the worshipers of Molech performed, it has sometimes been inferred, from the phrase "pass through the fire to Molech," that children were made to pass between two lines of fire as a kind of consecration or februation; but it is clear from Isa. lvii. 5 and Jer. xix. 5 that the children were killed and burned. The whole point of the offering consisted, therefore, in the fact that it was a human sacrifice. From Jer. vii. 31 and Ezek. xx. 25, 26, it is evident that both prophets regarded these human sacrifices as extraordinary offerings to Yhwh. Jeremiah declares that Yhwh had not commanded them, while Ezekiel says Yhwhpolluted the Israelites in their offerings by permitting them to sacrifice their first-born, so that through chastisement they might know that Yhwh was Yhwh. The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh as King or Counselor of the nation and that the Prophets disapproved of it and denounced it because it was introduced from outside as an imitation of a heathen cult and because of its barbarity. In course of time the pointing of "Melek" was changed to "Molech" to still further stigmatize the rites.

Motive of Sacrifices.

The motive for these sacrifices is not far to seek. It is given in Micah vi. 7: "Shall I give my first-born for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?" In the midst of the disasters which were befalling the nation men felt that if the favor of Yhwh could be regained it was worth any price they could pay. Their Semitic kindred worshiped their gods with offerings of their children, and in their desperation the Israelites did the same. For some reason, perhaps because not all the priestly and prophetic circles approved of the movement, they made the offerings, not in the Temple, but at an altar or pyre called "Tapheth" (LXX.), erected in the valley of Hinnom (comp. W. R. Smith, "Rel. of Sem." 2d ed., p. 372). "Tapheth," also, was later pointed "Topheth," after the analogy of "bosheth." In connection with these extraordinary offerings the worshipers continued the regular Temple sacrifices to Yhwh (Ezek. xxiii. 39).

Babylonian Cylinder Representing Sacrifice of a Child.(From Menant, "Glyptique Orientale.")

From the fact that I Kings xi. 7 calls Molech the "abomination of the children of Ammon" it was formerly assumed that this worship was an imitation of an Ammonite cult. But so little is known of the Ammonite religion that more recent scholarship has looked elsewhere for the source. Because of the mention in II Kings xvii. 31 of Adrammelech (= Adar-malik) and Anammelech (=Anu-malik) as gods of Sepharvaim transplanted to Samaria, it has been inferred that this form of worship was borrowed from Babylonia (comp. Bäthgen, "Beiträge zur Semitischen Religionsgesch." pp, 238 et seq.). This view rests on the supposition that "Sepharvaim" is equal to "Sippar," which probably is not the case. Even if it were, Anu and Adar were not gods of Sippar; Shamash was god of that city. From this verse, therefore, a Babylonian or Assyrian origin can not be demonstrated.

Support for this view has been sought also in Amos v. 26. If, as is probable, Siccuth and Chiun in that passage are names or epithets of Babylonian deities (comp. Chiun), the use of "Melek" in connection with these affords no sound basis for argument. The whole passage may be, as Wellhausen and Nowack believe, a late gloss introduced on account of II Kings xvii. 31, and is in any case too obscure to build upon. Furthermore, there is noevidence that the sacrifice of the first-born was a feature of the worship of Babylonian deities. Because child-sacrifice was a prominent feature of the worship of the Phenician Malik-Baal-Kronos, Moore (in Cheyne and Black, "Encyc. Bibl.") seeks to prove that the worship of Moloch was introduced from Phenicia. The evidence of its existence in Phenicia and her colonies is especially strong. Diodorus Siculus (xx. 14) tells how the Carthaginians in a siege sacrificed two hundred boys to Kronos. Burning was an important feature of the rite.

Bibliography:

W. R. Smith, Rel. of Sem. 2d ed., pp. 372 et seq.;
Bäthgen, Beiträge zur Semitischen Religionsgesch. 1888, pp. 237 et seq.;
Moore, The Image of Moloch, in Jour. Bib. Lit. 1897, xvi. 161 et seq.;
M. J. Lagrange, Etudes sur les Religions Sémitiques, 1903, pp. 99-109.

CHAIM WEIZMANN und Huter-Schüler AMANDUS KUPFER

Eine Beratung des Staatsgründers und ersten Staatspräsidenten von Israel beim Huter-Schüler und physiognomischen Schriftsteller Amandus Kupfer.

Damaliger Jüdischer Zionisten-Führer Chaim Weizmann besuchte in den 20er Jahren vergangenen 20. Jahrhunderts von einem jüdischen Zionisten-Kongress in Zürich kommend den bedeutsamsten Huter-Schüler Amandus Kupfer in seinem Domizil Schwaig bei Nürnberg.

Es ging damals ausdrücklich um die Frage Gründung eines neuen jüdischen Staates Israel.

Unser Huter-Schüler beschied dieses Ansinnen Chaim Weizmann positiv! Nach tatsächlicher Gründung des Staates Israel wurde Chaim Weizmann dessen erster Präsident.

KONKLUSION

Somit sind wir Huter-Freunde die wahren Freunde von Israel und seinen Menschen!

Quellen: Denkschrift Käthe Kupfer 1962;

Der gute Menschenkenner Nr. 1 und Nr. 2, 1932.

JAHR 1932

Es ist belegbare Wissenschafts-Historische Tatsache, daß Huter-Freunde publizistisch schon im Jahr 1932 damalige deutsche Bevölkerung und somit die Weltöffentlichkeit vor Adolf Hitler gewarnt hatten! Diplomatisch im Ausdruck und dennoch klar in der Aussage!

DAS BUCH VON 1941,

in Gefahr und Not vor der GESTAPO unter Lebensgefahr von Huter-Schüler Amandus Kupfer -sozusagen im Untergrund geschrieben:

DAS FASCHISTISCHE NAZI-VERBRECHERSYSTEM ist anhand seiner FÜHRENDEN OBERSTEN MACHTHABER direkt charakterlich dokumentiert.

Digital-Wieder-veröffentlicht von Carl-Huter-Zentral-Archiv durch Mensch wolfgangvonbraunschweig auf Hauptseite Carl-Huter-Zentral-Archiv www.chza.de:

Amandus Kupfer: Das Buch von 1941 - Part 13

CHZA1

Freitag, 24. Februar 2017